>>The article actually states quite clearly that it is not a new idea. I was talking about this bit, which is a bit lower: "but he is one of the first to argu

>>The article actually states quite clearly that it is not a new idea. I was talking about this bit, which is a bit lower: "but he is one of the first to argue we might already be living inside one." >>Are we really sure it's untestable? It seems like something that might be worth thinking about. If we look in the right places (theoretical math, physics?) might we be able to see reflections of a world "outside"? We can never be 100% sure it's untestable because it's impossible to prove a negative. But I put it in the same basket as testing the existance of a god.