4 ms·
You have argued one half of the equation, and stated that the other side cannot possibly add up that high. You've just replicated the "Watchmaker" argument of
by IAmBroom 1y ago
You have argued one half of the equation, and stated that the other side cannot possibly add up that high.
You've just replicated the "Watchmaker" argument of creationists: "Random chance can't account for these low probabilities that we can't yet quantified."