Yes, the quick to correct itself isn't really useful. I would not like a human assistant/intern/pair programmer who when asked how to do X said: > To accomplis

Yes, the quick to correct itself isn't really useful. I would not like a human assistant/intern/pair programmer who when asked how to do X said: > To accomplish X you can just use Y! But Y isn't applicable in this scenario. > Oh, you're absolutely right! Instead of Y you can do Z. Are you sure? I don't think Z accomplishes X. > On second thought you're absolutely correct. Y or Z will clearly not accomplish X, but let's try Q....