4 ms·

Nothing to do with dice though.

• deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
• blueflow 1y ago
  The whole "stochastic means to find factual correctness" thing is an error of method, arguing about weights here is nonsense.
  • chpatrick 1y ago
    It isn't though, the most factually correct human expert is also stochastic. The only question is how the dice are weighted.
    • blueflow 1y ago
      "human expert" as reference for "factually correct", oh just gently caress yourself. Appeal to authority (expert = social status) is as much bullshit as appeal to popularity.
      • chpatrick 1y ago
        Right now the fully deterministic always correct oracle machine doesn't exist. The most authorative answer we can get on a subject is from a respected human in their field (who is still stochastic). It's unrealistic to hold LLMs to a higher standard than that.
        • blueflow 1y ago
          "The runway is free" - Jacob Veldhuyzen van Zanten, respected aviation expert, 1977 teneriffa, brushing off the flight engineers concern about another machine on the runway
          • chpatrick 1y ago
            Ok, so humans are also fallible. Your point being?