In the age of LLMs responsible maintainers should treat contributor PRs the same way they treat AI slop: rewrite it if it's salvageable and ignore it if it's no

In the age of LLMs responsible maintainers should treat contributor PRs the same way they treat AI slop: rewrite it if it's salvageable and ignore it if it's not. Accepting any contribution 'as is' shouldn't be allowed unless it's a trivial 1-liner (with a thorough investigation attached).