4 ms·
Amtrak does have right-of-way by federal law for over 50 years now. However, the freight operators don't care and the federal government refuses to enforce it.
by c22 1y ago
Amtrak does have right-of-way by federal law for over 50 years now. However, the freight operators don't care and the federal government refuses to enforce it.
People with private train cars probably have a louder voice than most rail passengers so if this gets more popular perhaps that could change.
- bluGill 1y agoThe freight operators say they obey law. I've talk to their drivers (on my last trip one was taking amtrak) who tell about hours waiting for a late amtrak. i don't know who is right but I don't trust anyone to tell the full truth.
- stonogo 1y agoThey do obey the law: they're required to pull onto a siding to allow Amtrak to stay on time. So the operators ensure the train is too long for any of the sidings, which fits them into an escape clause. Any cargo train stuck waiting for Amtrak simply isn't fully stacked yet. Closing that loophole is what the government is dragging its feet about.
- FridayoLeary 1y agoFrom wikipedia > United States – BNSF Railway and Union Pacific Railroad (UP) regularly operate intermodal container trains exceeding 5,000 metres (16,500 ft) in length on main lines in the western United States. On the UP, these trains can stretch to over 6,100 metres (20,000 ft) with 5 locomotives and 280 well cars. Those are incredible figures. It would almost be a shame to ban such amazing monuments to engineering. Not to mention that it's probably the most efficent and enviromentally friendly way to do things.
- Wowfunhappy 1y agoIMO the freight companies should be able to pay to build longer sidings if they need them, but they should have to pay for it.
- tschwimmer 1y agoThey're not going to build a 4 mile siding, which is the length that many freight operate at. At that point it's like building a second set of tracks.
- Wowfunhappy 1y agoThen don't build 4 mile trains. It needs to be possible for trains to pass each other.
- bluGill 1y agoa lot of rail is 2 track so no sidings are needed.
- guappa 1y agoBecause trains never go the other direction anyway.
- bombcar 1y agoDual track isn’t really a two way road, with signaling it ends up being infinite sidings, and is used almost more for passing than for two-way traffic - if it exists outside cities. Unfortunately much of the USA is single or effectively single tracked.
- hypercube33 1y agoIt's not due to the logistics of rail labor and a bunch of other things. I forget the math but smaller trains can run more often without sitting for hours and take advantage of fuel and labor better. the podcast well there's your problem covered it in deep detail
- bobthepanda 1y agoit's possible that freight trains are waiting for an Amtrak that was itself, earlier delayed by freight trains and became late. And given that equipment on a route will become the return journey this could cascade out of control. Amtraks are never in charge of dispatching on routes they don't own, and there's a very clear correlation between on time performance and percentage of the route they do own.