4 ms·

A translation is entirely different from a reformat. Translating Homer from Greek to English is more than simply matching up words. It is a creative venture tha

A translation is entirely different from a reformat. Translating Homer from Greek to English is more than simply matching up words. It is a creative venture that results in a fair amount of originality. According to the Supreme Court of the United States, "the sine qua non of copyright is originality."[1] Effort is generally irrelevant when it comes to determining copyrightabilty, so a reformatted version would need a certain level of originality to be copyrightable. [1] http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/499_US_340.htm http://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/499_US_340.htm Also argued to be 'uniqueness' by a Professor at Miami School of Law: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1906047 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1906047

ChuckMcM 14y ago
I invite you to argue that way against Sony among others, who have taken works out of copyright and republished them in alternate forms establishing their own copyright. They argue that converting the work to the new format meets the transformation standard set by existing law. Somehow I don't think Walter will go out and sue people if they make copies of this e-book but I do expect that should he do so he would prevail. So off list one of the Gutenberg folks pointed out this exception: "Chuck they get away with this by adding a new introduction or critical essay to be book, delete that and its back to public domain." And notes that every republished work by various publishers that use public domain material does add an introduction or a bit about the author to establish that Copyright. So I take it all back, Walter you should introduce your book with your thoughts on how appropriate it is and then charge what ever you want :-)
- WalterBright 14y ago
  LOL, but I don't really mind that much. Like I said, I like the book and think everyone should enjoy it. I also have a crapton of out-of-print books that are available nowhere, that I would put online for free if it weren't for the dang copyright laws. Some I have attempted to find the copyright owners, but I just find deadends. It's really a sad state of affairs. My personal opinion (and I make my living selling copyrighted software) is that copyrights should be good for 20 years. After that, you can keep the copyright going only if you're willing to send in a $1000 fee every year for each copyright, and that fee should go up a percent a year or so. That'll put all the abandoned works into the public domain.

ChuckMcM 14y ago

I invite you to argue that way against Sony among others, who have taken works out of copyright and republished them in alternate forms establishing their own copyright. They argue that converting the work to the new format meets the transformation standard set by existing law. Somehow I don't think Walter will go out and sue people if they make copies of this e-book but I do expect that should he do so he would prevail. So off list one of the Gutenberg folks pointed out this exception: "Chuck they get away with this by adding a new introduction or critical essay to be book, delete that and its back to public domain." And notes that every republished work by various publishers that use public domain material does add an introduction or a bit about the author to establish that Copyright. So I take it all back, Walter you should introduce your book with your thoughts on how appropriate it is and then charge what ever you want :-)

WalterBright 14y ago
LOL, but I don't really mind that much. Like I said, I like the book and think everyone should enjoy it. I also have a crapton of out-of-print books that are available nowhere, that I would put online for free if it weren't for the dang copyright laws. Some I have attempted to find the copyright owners, but I just find deadends. It's really a sad state of affairs. My personal opinion (and I make my living selling copyrighted software) is that copyrights should be good for 20 years. After that, you can keep the copyright going only if you're willing to send in a $1000 fee every year for each copyright, and that fee should go up a percent a year or so. That'll put all the abandoned works into the public domain.