4 ms·
The number of false positives using only motion is tiring. You want smart detections otherwise you're stuck reviewing endless clips of spider webs and swaying
by creaturemachine 1y ago
The number of false positives using only motion is tiring. You want smart detections otherwise you're stuck reviewing endless clips of spider webs and swaying tree branches.
- FirmwareBurner 1y agoIf your use case has such a high bar, why not pay some offshore workers to watch your camera 24/7 and manually flag intruders? Since AGI for cameras is very far away as the number of false positives and creative workarounds for camouflage is insane to be caught by current "smart" algorithms.
- adiabatichottub 1y agoBecause machines don't get bored or take smoke breaks. And, really, how would you feel if that was YOUR job?
- FirmwareBurner 1y ago>Because machines don't get bored or take smoke breaks. Rotations? Like the military hold perimeter security? >And, really, how would you feel if that was YOUR job? If I couldn't get a better job to pay my bills, then that would be amazing. Weird of you to assume like that would somehow be the most dehumanizing job in existence.
- Mistletoe 1y agoAnd moving boxes with people inside. I’m reminded of the Skyrim shopkeepers with a basket on their head.