5 ms·

It’s never been shared, FWIW. The rails are mostly privately owned and were built that way too. That said - bullet trains are great but I fully support the abi

It’s never been shared, FWIW. The rails are mostly privately owned and were built that way too. That said - bullet trains are great but I fully support the ability of individuals to pay to access freight or passenger rail to subsidize the infra.

rbanffy 1y ago
> bullet trains are great but I fully support the ability of individuals to pay to access freight or passenger rail to subsidize the infra. It’d be even nicer if you could hook your private car to a bullet train.
- LargoLasskhyfv 1y ago
  Unlikely. Because they tend to be close-coupled units with distributed power and traction control. In case of anything Talgo-related with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobs_bogie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobs_bogie 's even more so.
  - rbanffy 1y ago
    It’d need to be a new stander for rail cars, but that seems totally reasonable.
jazzyjackson 1y ago
Land was granted to the railroads with the agreement that they would run passenger rail services. When passenger rail became so unprofitable that it was bankrupting rail companies, they lobbied to make it the governments responsibility to move people around and leave them to make money shuffling freight.
- bluGill 1y ago
  Most rails were not land grant. Those were what you read about in history, but most had to buy their own land. Land grant mostly was for places where today almost nobody lives and even less back then.
  - bombcar 1y ago
    The rails across the (very roughly) Southwest are some of the most famous, but the real activity was all on the East.
- bobthepanda 1y ago
  It was kind of a mixed bag. Part of the way this worked was that USPS was actually paying for a lot of the rail services to deliver mail (which is also what the government wanted more so than passenger rail service.) The moment USPS pulled contracts in favor of long-distance airmail the whole model went belly-up.
  - ghaff 1y ago
    And long distance airmail subsidized a lot of early flight as well.

rbanffy 1y ago

> bullet trains are great but I fully support the ability of individuals to pay to access freight or passenger rail to subsidize the infra. It’d be even nicer if you could hook your private car to a bullet train.

LargoLasskhyfv 1y ago
Unlikely. Because they tend to be close-coupled units with distributed power and traction control. In case of anything Talgo-related with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobs_bogie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobs_bogie 's even more so.
- rbanffy 1y ago
  It’d need to be a new stander for rail cars, but that seems totally reasonable.

jazzyjackson 1y ago

Land was granted to the railroads with the agreement that they would run passenger rail services. When passenger rail became so unprofitable that it was bankrupting rail companies, they lobbied to make it the governments responsibility to move people around and leave them to make money shuffling freight.

bluGill 1y ago
Most rails were not land grant. Those were what you read about in history, but most had to buy their own land. Land grant mostly was for places where today almost nobody lives and even less back then.
- bombcar 1y ago
  The rails across the (very roughly) Southwest are some of the most famous, but the real activity was all on the East.
bobthepanda 1y ago
It was kind of a mixed bag. Part of the way this worked was that USPS was actually paying for a lot of the rail services to deliver mail (which is also what the government wanted more so than passenger rail service.) The moment USPS pulled contracts in favor of long-distance airmail the whole model went belly-up.
- ghaff 1y ago
  And long distance airmail subsidized a lot of early flight as well.