Don't the companies in the headlines pay big bucks for people working on "AI"? Maybe they are paying big bucks for people who are actually very bad at their jo

Don't the companies in the headlines pay big bucks for people working on "AI"? Maybe they are paying big bucks for people who are actually very bad at their jobs? Why would the CEOs tolerate that? Do they think it's a profitable/strategic thing to get away with, rather than a sign of incompetence? When subtrees of the org chart don't care that they are very bad at their jobs, harmed parties might have to sue to get the company to stop.