> where one song may have been remixed with three different > people, now you have to start infecting the track names > with the remixer. For what it

> where one song may have been remixed with three different > people, now you have to start infecting the track names > with the remixer. For what it's worth, I don't consider that "infecting". It's really the only sane way to handle huge collaborative works. There are always exceptions which break any categorization scheme. The point is to treat them as exceptions, ie. fold them into the 90% model as well as you can, rather than restructuring your model to accomodate for 100% of every conceivable artistic license. > And then you've got classical music, This one _is_ interesting, but I solved it (personally) when I realized I only cared about the original composer (eg. Mozart) in terms of "artist", and the minimum nomenclature to disambiguate movements, etc. in terms of "title". Trivia like the performing orchestra is perfectly well homed in the album title, or ignored entirely. I admit I'm only interested in listening to classical music, not cataloging it to some deeper academic purpose.