4 ms·
> they are just feigning a lack of understanding to be dismissive of Anubis. I actually find the featured article very interesting. It doesn't feel dismissive
by palata 1y ago
> they are just feigning a lack of understanding to be dismissive of Anubis.
I actually find the featured article very interesting. It doesn't feel dismissive of Anubis, but rather it questions whether this particular solution makes sense or not in a constructive way.
- johnklos 1y agoI agree - the article is interesting and not dismissive. I was talking more about some of the people here ;)
- dmesg 1y agoI still don't understand what Anubis solves if it can be bypassed too easily: If you use User-agent switcher (i emulate wget) as firefox addon on kernel.org or ffmpeg.org you save the entire check time and straight up skip Anubis. Apparently they use a whitelist for user-agents due to allowing legitimate wget usage on these domains. However if I (an honest human can) the scrapers and grifters can too. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/uaswitcher/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/uaswitcher/ If anyone wants to try themselves. This is by no means against Anubis, but raising the question: Can you even protect a domain if you force yourself to whitelist (for a full bypass) easy to guess UAs?
- hooverd 1y agoIt's extra work for scrapers. They pretend to be upstanding citizens (Chrome UA from residential IPs). You can more easily block those.
- 20after4 1y agoA lot of scrapers are actually utilizing some malware installed on residential user's machines, so the request is legitimately coming from a chrome UA on a residential ip.
- dragonwriter 1y agoWell, “actually”, perhaps; “legitimately” is still a stretch.