> since you appear to be of the opinion that Musk was somehow indicating a useful fact of some kind, No but I am glad he took action to fix it. The Cobol 150

> since you appear to be of the opinion that Musk was somehow indicating a useful fact of some kind, No but I am glad he took action to fix it. The Cobol 150 year thing is also incorrect and was widely criticized in tech circles: https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/31288/did-missing-corrupt-dates-in-cobol-default-to-1875-05-20 https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/31288/did...