5 ms·
[flagged]
by thrown-0825 1y ago
[flagged]
- ed_elliott_asc 1y agoI’d imagine pretty much all of the s and p 500 companies rely on databricks, a large percentage of them at least
- thrown-0825 1y agofor what? managed postgres and some ml training tools?
- esafak 1y agoSpark
- dahcryn 1y agobecause it's recommended by nearly all consultants and Microsoft. Simple as that, it's consulting Heaven. Much like SAS and SAP. Everybody happy. Now to be far to databricks, if used properly and ignore the cost, it does actually function pretty well. Compared to Synapse, PowerBI Tabular, Fabric, Azure ML, ... that's already a big big big step forward.
- datadrivenangel 1y agoDatabricks is janky, but so much better than the Azure services for data. If you're buying from microsoft, it won't be cheap either way, might as well treat yourself a little bit.
- thrown-0825 1y agoDont forget salesforce
- _dark_matter_ 1y agoI'm as skeptical as anyone, but have you ever heard of companies like Oracle, which got rich off a database or Snowflake (current market cap 65B)? Companies pay oodles of money for that capabilities.
- thrown-0825 1y agooracle succeeded because of its lobbyists and sales contacts, so much so that they spun out into another multi billion $ org
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]