3 ms·
This seems like a five alarm fire for HIPPA, is there something I’m missing?
by QuadmasterXLII 1y ago
This seems like a five alarm fire for HIPPA, is there something I’m missing?
- loeg 1y agoIt's HIPAA.
- adzm 1y agoThe HIPAA hippo certainly encourages this confusion
- ivewonyoung 1y agoIt's HIPPA now for all intensive purposes.
- FergusArgyll 1y agoFor all intents and purposes
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- Spooky23 1y agoIt’s a bug. He reported it, they fixed it. It is not a five alarm fire for HIPAA. HIPAA doesn’t require that all file access be logged at all. HIPAA also doesn’t require that a CVE be created for each defect in a product. End of the day, it’s a hand-wavy, “look at me” security blog. Don’t get too crazy.
- waffleiron 1y agoI am more on the privacy side of things like HIPAA, but I would like to link the following. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/january-2017-cyber-newsletter.pdf https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/january-2017-cyber-n...
- Spooky23 1y agoThere’s discretion in reasonable and appropriate. Biggest thing is to have plan and policy. I’d agree in general that more audit is better.