> Hard to count the number of things that can go wrong by relying directly on an LLM to manage audit/activity/etc. logs. Nothing in this post suggests that the

> Hard to count the number of things that can go wrong by relying directly on an LLM to manage audit/activity/etc. logs. Nothing in this post suggests that they're relying on the LLM itself to append to the audit logs. That would be a preposterous design. It seems far more likely the audit logs are being written by the scaffolding, not by the LLM, but they instrumented the wrong places. (I.e. emitting on a link or maybe a link preview being output, rather than e.g. on the document being fed to the LLM as a result of RAG or a tool call.) (Writing the audit logs in the scaffolding is probably also the wrong design, but at least it's just a bad design rather than a totally absurd one.)