The article begins alluding that tea was behaving in bad faith before the publisher of the article begin behaving in bad faith by hiding the rest of the articl

The article begins alluding that tea was behaving in bad faith before the publisher of the article begin behaving in bad faith by hiding the rest of the article. I could go pull it up in archive but I don’t care enough. There probably isn’t evidence of bad faith. If there is I may never see it because I’m not going to subscribe to 404. So I’ll just assume they’re making shit up.