2 ms·
I mean, "resource intensive"; that's technically true but the processes are pretty short-lived and only one spawns at a time as far as I can tell. It's definite
by tombert 1y ago
I mean, "resource intensive"; that's technically true but the processes are pretty short-lived and only one spawns at a time as far as I can tell. It's definitely more overhead than an in-thread thing, but still not that much on modern computers.
I agree that it would be more efficient to do these things in batches but I really don't think its current state is that bad, at least for a V1.