2 ms·
I just don't think it's that bad. Even if it spawns a process for each frame when you're scrubbing, it seems to run fast enough on my computer. If you want to
by tombert 1y ago
I just don't think it's that bad. Even if it spawns a process for each frame when you're scrubbing, it seems to run fast enough on my computer.
If you want to do a lot of advanced video editing then yeah use a real editor, but if you're just doing a quick trim it's really not a big deal to spin up a few dozen very-short-lived processes.
- mr_toad 1y agoIt’s probably be more efficient to convert the video to multiple frames in batches, and then buffer them. Spawning processes is pretty resource intensive.
- tombert 1y agoI mean, "resource intensive"; that's technically true but the processes are pretty short-lived and only one spawns at a time as far as I can tell. It's definitely more overhead than an in-thread thing, but still not that much on modern computers. I agree that it would be more efficient to do these things in batches but I really don't think its current state is that bad, at least for a V1.