I think LLM vendors papers entertain such confusions, the lack of peer reviewing tends to favour grandiose but barely defined wording as such. At least author s

I think LLM vendors papers entertain such confusions, the lack of peer reviewing tends to favour grandiose but barely defined wording as such. At least author seems to have checked a few papers that do some empirical validation (which is still different from establishing any kind of theory of prompt engineering, there is no other way than cutting the model up to do that).