3 ms·
Looking at CEO pay as the primary reason for inadequate living standards is an egregious mistake and a big pet peeve of mine. CEO's and companies _create_ weal
by simianwords 1y ago
Looking at CEO pay as the primary reason for inadequate living standards is an egregious mistake and a big pet peeve of mine.
CEO's and companies _create_ wealth. It can be true that by taxing and redistributing you can increase living standards of poor people but it is not at all the case that they are the primary reason other people don't have money.
There are two forces that are somewhat equally important: creating wealth that never existed before and distributing it if necessary to maintain some equitability. The redistribution part is only possible because the wealth was created to be redistributed later.
Creating wealth (which is done by companies and CEO's are a big part of it) is strictly a positive increase - creating wealth doesn't mean you take it from others which is a very common misconception I keep noticing in many places. CEO's paid a lot of money is not money that is taken away from others - it is new money that didn't exist.
Now to be fair this article doesn't say it out loud but I think the vibes are there and many people do believe this.
- miltonlost 1y agoAtlas Shrugged was not an economic textbook. CEOs create nothing. They make no widgets, they code no infrastructure, they build nothing real.
- simianwords 1y agoWhy are they paid so high by the board then? Surely they would have realised what you realised and hired a random person and paid them minimal wages and kept the remaining to themselves.
- ryandvm 1y agoAnd let's be real, as far as actual work output is concerned, I think there are few jobs in this economy that are better suited to replacement by an AI. If only they made an AI that could schmooze at the country club.