> way; it was superpowered with keyboard shortcuts that just made sense No, that's under-powered. Powered is when you can define multiple simple custom shortc

> way; it was superpowered with keyboard shortcuts that just made sense No, that's under-powered. Powered is when you can define multiple simple custom shortcuts (as far as I understand, at least Zen allows 1 shortcut change for some commands (unlike 0 in the dumb FF), so halfway there, not sure about Arc). Super powered is when you can add key sequences and keys without modifiers depending on context in addition to a simple shortcuts. Uberpowered would be the equivalent of QMK within the app (tap vs hold, home row mods left vs right alt, all 4 modifiers, etc etc), but when you can have conditions based on app contexts and dynamic user defined conditions (eg, in the simplest way, have vim-like modal editing in text fields with word jumps and single key navigation outside). While uberpowered apps are unicorns, among relatively known browsers think only Vivaldi has has power > Firefox remains the gold standard for user-first browsing. What's gold about poor customization (no keybind, but also changing UI is cumbersome) and bad defaults? > why isn’t it Firefox? Oh, why indeed! Something about lack of incentives to innovate of even listen to users much when you're a big company financed by "ulterior" sources