3 ms·
> alternatively, you can put the type arguments into the .collect() calls: Instead of writing out a turbofish both times, I’d probably leave the first unannota
by chrismorgan 1y ago
> alternatively, you can put the type arguments into the .collect() calls:
Instead of writing out a turbofish both times, I’d probably leave the first unannotated and put `::Vec<Vec<_>>` on the second one.
- Tuna-Fish 1y agoFair. I didn't even consider how that variant should be done, because whenever I find myself writing a turbofish I instantly ask myself, can I put this type in a definition somewhere instead?