> I also find it hard to argue (in a work context, for example) my own views without just citing what I've read. Pointing people to a good article is more than

> I also find it hard to argue (in a work context, for example) my own views without just citing what I've read. Pointing people to a good article is more than enough. If they're set in their ways, no amount of oratory skills will make them change. > How do you evaluate which sources are worth trusting? I don't; it would make me the same as people relying on social media influencers. > How do you know when advice is valuable vs. dogma? If the ROI ((quantifiable benefits - costs) / costs) for following it is high enough. > Any tips for developing this critical lens earlier in your career? Looking at the ROI for following the advice. Though beware - you'll end up becoming less employable because you won't chase the shiny new thing :)