3 ms·
There’s an obvious workaround - require the payment for everyone, and on the side offer to pay the customer $x (which coincidentally is the same as the payment
by bombcar 1y ago
There’s an obvious workaround - require the payment for everyone, and on the side offer to pay the customer $x (which coincidentally is the same as the payment needed) for personal information.
- Ukv 1y agoI don't think this trick would do anything - you're still conditioning a contract on consent (and it's no more necessary than before), so still don't have "freely given consent" if you wanted to rely on that basis for data processing.
- mytailorisrich 1y agoYou're repeating a claim that is widespread but that appears nowhere in the GDPR.
- Ukv 1y ago> > Consent is presumed not to be freely given [...] if the performance of a contract, including the provision of a service, is dependent on the consent despite such consent not being necessary for such performance.
- mytailorisrich 1y agoThat's not the same as your previous comment.