5 ms·
Even if prayers were real, this sounds like a huge gimmick. Reciting a prayer while holding a book equals reciting the entire book at once? How absolutely conve
by Almondsetat 1y ago
Even if prayers were real, this sounds like a huge gimmick. Reciting a prayer while holding a book equals reciting the entire book at once? How absolutely convenient. Who thought of that, a door-to-door salesman?
- npteljes 1y agoAll depends on the prayer quota. If one can do "9 000 000 mantras per minute" easily, then maybe what's needed for betterment is a totality of a quintillion prayers in one's life.
- N_Lens 1y agoJust a ritual, the design is Very Human!
- moomoo11 1y agoMan searching for God is like a hacker trying to find super user on some remote system. Turns out someone else made both :P
- Imustaskforhelp 1y agoThis feels like one of the quotes that needs to be quoted and I would quote you if I can understand what you mean by "turns out someone else made both" as maybe its me who didn't get its meaning (so can you please explain what you mean by this? thanks in advance!)
- Hnrobert42 1y agoI think they mean: turns out someone else made both the computer system and man. They are implying the existence of god.
- moomoo11 1y agoThanks
- moomoo11 1y agoThe hacker and the system share the same maker, so the search was never outside to begin with. Breaking in is ironic, because the hacker is already part of what was created by the superuser they are looking for.
- Imustaskforhelp 1y agoOhh alright gotcha! thanks!
- StableAlkyne 1y agoDoes that mean a seance is akin to running 'wall' in your local haunted house?
- notahacker 1y agoClearly an operations lead tasked with exponential increases in mantra output. In all seriousness, I don't think the average person could have actually read the books when the concept was conceived anyway, so automating the trick of the recipient receiving all the blessings in the book without someone having to read them out would have saved a whole lot of monks' time....
- IT4MD 1y agoBut look at the consequences. They have zero OpSec! These very manuals are now for sale on the open and dark web and anyone can buy one and start accumulation of karma points! FFS, the chant password has already been distributed and they changed nothing! There is no encryption, it's all plain text at rest. SMH. There is no auth process. Anyone can walk up, grab a prayer turbine and start spinning it for all they are worth. I would not be surprised if I saw a motorcycle, on it's side, with the drive wheel touching a prayer turbine, and spinning it at 100s of RPMs. Don't get me started on their callous handling of libraries that these texts reference or the complete lack of standards when new data is added. They just throw it into the pile and keep spinning. :| They may have a handle on religion, but their data security sucks, frankly.
- woodrowbarlow 1y agoand does anyone actually audit their scrolls? there could be malprayer slipped in there.
- graemep 1y agoI guess you are the product of a culture formed by a theistic religion? Buddhism has some very different ideas. Its also quite varied - Theravada is more different from Zen than protestant Christianity is from Catholic or Orthodox. Most types of Christian prayer are about having in effect on yourself, so it would not make sense. Even intercessionary prayer is a personal request, so this sort of thing sounds wrong, but the prayer wheels arise from completely different beliefs.
- Almondsetat 1y agoI fail to see how your reply is remotely relevant to what I've said. Any way you put it this seems like a convenient "tradition" to allow people to pray less but make them feel as if they prayed more
- tom_ 1y agoBut what if that's not how prayer works? What if rotating the prayer wheels is just as effective as saying the prayers out loud? And what if that effect really can be multiplied up mechanically, somehow, and what if it doesn't actually matter whether people say them out loud or not? There'd be little reason not to use prayer wheels. And the people using them would be doing the exact opposite of praying less. They'd be praying more! You're claiming prayers are not real, but then seem not to be following through fully with this, by subsequently assuming that if they were real, it would be inevitable that they'd have to operate in some particular way. But that wouldn't automatically follow. I think this is the reply's point.
- Almondsetat 1y agoMy point is that since writing is a human invention (and a recent one at that), having a tradition where you can conveniently multiply your prayers through scripture seems utterly convenient and manufactured
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 1y ago