3 ms·
It's open source to people and organizations who are not assholes and thieves. I don't care about my fake internet points, so have at it.
by buildsjets 1y ago
It's open source to people and organizations who are not assholes and thieves.
I don't care about my fake internet points, so have at it.
- foxglacier 1y agoYou don't like open source but want to ride off its good name so you're co-opting the term to mean something else. We already have a widely accepted term for this type of license - "source available".
- benrutter 1y agoI kinda think "open" is a word that's immediately undermined by any qualification. I'm really down for more variety with licenses like this one, but "open source" has become really unhelpful because it's used for: - Open source for half the code, and the other half is proprietary - Open source as long as you aren't a company - Open source as long as you aren't a company competing with us It's helpful to have a term for "free to do whatever you want with", but we don't really have on that doesn't get misused elsewhere right now.