3 ms·

> Under the pretext of protecting denocracy, the unelected, supposedly impartial brazilian supreme court waged an all out legal and political war against our "T

> Under the pretext of protecting denocracy, the unelected, supposedly impartial brazilian supreme court waged an all out legal and political war against our "Trump equivalent". They have engaged in unconstitutional censorship and politically motivated arrests. This personal opinion sounds awfully outlandish, and it's baffling how it leaves out the fact that the "trump equivalent" engaged in a coup and your wall of text boils down to "he is facing a trial for his coup attempt, and he is currently awaiting sentence". In fact, each discussion you cited reminds you of this fact, but somehow you repeatedly posted outlandish comments, such as claiming that judges ruling over a coup attempt are somehow the ones perpetrating a coup? Perhaps someone else from Brazil should chime in, as I feel your comments convey an alternative version of reality that doesn't reflect the majority of facts and instead leans heavily on unsupported and very emotional and partial interpretations. Edit: while reading through the discussions you cited, I stumbled upon your comment discussing how you are going through therapy and your therapist already gave you recommendations on how you should modulate your behavior. Perhaps it's time to consider the recommendation. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44744606 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44744606

matheusmoreira 1y ago
> your wall of text That was merely a summary of my commentary on the matter over the course of many HN threads. There's no point in engaging with you if you won't actually read those arguments. You've clearly demonstrated you're not willing to actually discuss this. So I won't either.
- owebmaster 1y ago
  Do you feel like you are on a Crusade? All the posts you are always arguing alone, repeating the same arguments, ignoring everything multiple different people says and then get back to the same vitriolic argument.
  - matheusmoreira 1y ago
    > Do you feel like you are on a Crusade? I just care a lot. What's going on in this country deeply offends my sense of justice. > ignoring everything multiple different people says Nope, I try really hard to not ignore things. When I disagree, I explain why. If I can't rationalize it, then I must incorporate it into my world view. I do ignore name calling, feigned concern and vague allusions to mental illness. You too have done this before. I won't engage with it.

matheusmoreira 1y ago

> your wall of text That was merely a summary of my commentary on the matter over the course of many HN threads. There's no point in engaging with you if you won't actually read those arguments. You've clearly demonstrated you're not willing to actually discuss this. So I won't either.

owebmaster 1y ago
Do you feel like you are on a Crusade? All the posts you are always arguing alone, repeating the same arguments, ignoring everything multiple different people says and then get back to the same vitriolic argument.
- matheusmoreira 1y ago
  > Do you feel like you are on a Crusade? I just care a lot. What's going on in this country deeply offends my sense of justice. > ignoring everything multiple different people says Nope, I try really hard to not ignore things. When I disagree, I explain why. If I can't rationalize it, then I must incorporate it into my world view. I do ignore name calling, feigned concern and vague allusions to mental illness. You too have done this before. I won't engage with it.