6 ms·
I tried to write a sentence in the same spirit. "I love my partner more than any other person in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right
by borroka 1y ago
I tried to write a sentence in the same spirit.
"I love my partner more than any other person in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize them perpetually".
Why doesn't my sentence work, except for the lunatic? Because America is not a person or an object, it is an idea and praxis. He loves the idea, but perpetually criticizes the praxis.
But I find it inappropriate to use the pronoun “she/her,” as Baldwin does. It is an “it,” an idea/praxis (in this case, in other cases it can also be a geographical location).
- megaloblasto 1y agoJames Baldwin was born in 1924. Language changes a lot in 100 years. He is one of the greatest American authors and has a very intentional use of words. In this case, perhaps the use of her is supposed to convey an intimacy with his relationship to the country as more than just an object, but as a integral part of his lived experience.
- hmmokidk 1y agoCalling a person out is integral to any relationship, and can be done endearingly. People need to be reminded of reality at times. Humans are delusional animals.
- borroka 1y ago"Criticize them perpetually" is far from endearing, though. And certainly not a dream of anybody. It makes much more sense in the context of politics or dreams or ideas. After all, we have already read of permanent revolutions, and criticism and self-criticism.