3 ms·
How would you know if it didn’t? The very nature of the problem means that it’s hidden!
by baggy_trough 1y ago
How would you know if it didn’t? The very nature of the problem means that it’s hidden!
- nobody9999 1y ago>How would you know if it didn’t? The very nature of the problem means that it’s hidden! Even if it's at a polling place on the day of, it's still a secret ballot. As such, of course it's hidden. It's a secret ballot. What are you going on about?
- baggy_trough 1y agoAbsolutely, which is why I oppose mail in ballots. They don't have that property!
- alistairSH 1y agoNot sure what you mean - every implementation of mail-in ballots I've seen has a doubly sealed pair of envelopes. It's no less secret than pushing a button in a booth. The ballot is physically checked (but not counted) upon receipt and an email/text/etc is sent to confirm delivery with no issues.
- baggy_trough 1y agoI'm talking about the "abusive spouse" attack, which can take many forms. So the time between receiving the ballot and mailing it back is when privacy is easily violated.
- ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago[flagged]
- baggy_trough 1y agoI think you are trampling curiosity right now.
- ThrowMeAway1618 1y ago[flagged]