3 ms·
> Down voting should be a way of saying, this is either wrong information, misleading, or not helpful. Many people claim that down-voting should only be used i
by michaelhoffman 14y ago
> Down voting should be a way of saying, this is either wrong information, misleading, or not helpful.
Many people claim that down-voting should only be used in very specific cases, but The Stack Overflow guideline seen while mousing over the down arrow is "This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful." I think that (especially the insufficient research part) is pretty broad.
- monksy 14y agoI argue about this with Shog9 [a newer mod] on meta. His response was that it should be dead on, completely right [despite hidden assumptions]. Even if it was correct [and maybe not related: lets say that someone is asking about how to opt c++ code, most advice will say to improve the design, but an answer on gcc opt flags is relivant just not exactly what was asked] it should be downvoted. I called him out on that insanity, he was a big member on CodeProject, as was I. His excuse for that "codeproject turned in a shithole, lets not make this place like that" [not exactly what he said but it sums up many of his responses].
- m_myers 14y agoIt would probably be relevant to mention that your conversations with Shog9 [1] [2] took place nearly three years ago, long before he was hired (he's a community coordinator, not a moderator). [1]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/a/29024/13531 http://meta.stackoverflow.com/a/29024/13531 [2]: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/a/36401/13531 http://meta.stackoverflow.com/a/36401/13531
- monksy 14y agoAhh! You found it. I could have sworn he was a mod then. Oh well, he had a rather large role at the time. [Not something easily obtained]