3 ms·
For this to work efficiently maybe we will need to evaluate the form factor of homes in general (particularly in the US). An example is olives. For centuries p
by mythrwy 1y ago
For this to work efficiently maybe we will need to evaluate the form factor of homes in general (particularly in the US).
An example is olives. For centuries people picked or beat olives off of big trees but with machinery they have developed miniature olives that grow in neat hedgerows and can be easily harvested by machines.
I keep thinking about how much space people actually need to live. Bedrooms in particular. If all you need a bedroom for is sleep or romantic activities, why do bedrooms need to be 200+ square feet? Clothes ideally should be stored in another place where you dress and that place should be close to where clothes are laundered and where you shower and prep for the day. An annex to the bathroom, a dressing room seems ideal to me for clothes storage. In this case I'd be perfectly fine with a capsule bedroom big enough to hold a bed, a nightstand and nothing else.
I don't have any other concrete suggestions that would make automation easier but I'm sure this is possible.
- aetherson 1y agoI agree that you could imagine that homes could be laid out more efficiently for automation. However, the vast majority of housing stock is not new and is not cheap to remodel. The result is going to be incredible pressure to make robots fit existing houses, otherwise your market share is going to be like 2% of the TAM.