3 ms·
> From the outside, it would appear to any domain expert that at least three other people worked on these giving the pace at which they got completed. Did seve
by soiltype 1y ago
> From the outside, it would appear to any domain expert that at least three other people worked on these giving the pace at which they got completed.
Did several domain experts tell you this or are you making it up?
> I can't imagine how anyone, in any field of information systems, is not multiples more effective than they were five years ago.
Perhaps "they are massively more complex than anything I've done"
- brettgriffin 1y ago> Did several domain experts tell you this or are you making it up? It's an assertion among eight other engineers on the project with ~15 years of experience in the domain. They are domain experts. This part isn't up for debate.
- soiltype 1y agoI'm not questioning the credentials of your coworkers - I didn't know they existed! Just so I'm clear then, because this adds a lot of context: Nobody else worked on the 2 softwares you mentioned, but you are on a team? Are the softwares part of a business, one that's making money?
- brettgriffin 1y agoI misinterpreted your intent. Sorry. My key takeaway from my initial comment, based on replies, is how rare it is for someone to build software for money on this forum. Correct, they didn't directly work on these features. These integrate into a larger pieces of software, both of which directly generate revenue from these features.
- dgfitz 1y ago> These integrate into a larger pieces of software, both of which directly generate revenue from these features. Were these larger pieces of software _already_ generating revenue, before your features? First dollar is the hardest one to make.