Yeah, unfortunately "can't win them all" has been part of the developer platform since the dawn of the internet. I didn't drill down deep into the UX on the si

Yeah, unfortunately "can't win them all" has been part of the developer platform since the dawn of the internet. I didn't drill down deep into the UX on the site, but the m. version isn't that bad on a tablet - it's just quite obviously more fitting to a screen 300-400 pixels wide. If you had iPad users previously saying they wanted a "mobile" version, see if you can figure out what specifically it was about the desktop version of the site that was bugging them. Do the same for the people asking about a "tablet version", and then find a happy medium of the two to start working towards. Of course you can already predict that a desktop AND mobile AND tablet version is approaching silly, which is why the feedback you got before was a resounding "responsive design". At the moment, that's the closest you can get to "winning them all".