We need to be critically honest about how our system operates. Land is finite. As population grows, supply and demand dictate it will rise in value if you hol

We need to be critically honest about how our system operates. Land is finite. As population grows, supply and demand dictate it will rise in value if you hold. If you rent property that someone else would prefer to buy for habitation if made available at market rate, you’re benefiting at overall society’s expense. Similarly if you take units off the market as investment vehicles. Productivity matters most in economics. Without it you’re just shifting money around. Owning as a middle man is essentially the opposite of productivity. As rentals become the only option and a small percentage of land owners become the only housing option, we’re going to see a rise in wealthy untethered types who rent and move at will. Similarly, we’ll start seeing ghettos form in the scant land remaining after this fully plays out. The problem is that you can’t tell an individual who had to go through hell to own a place, on the verge of a second home, not to rent instead of sell. This society is a hammer taking a chip out of every successful shoulder. “Why should I do society a favor when society did me none?” Is a common mindset that just exacerbates the issue. We’re creating a resentful generation who feel disenfranchised and taken advantage of, and it’s only going to get worse. I fear for uprisings and surveillance states incoming. For real solutions, bring back work from home. No need for dense housing when you’re not forced to live in a particular area.