4 ms·
Calling something "controversial" is a total non-argument. The book's science about IQ is solid. In actuality, the content of the book was simply a collection
by machomaster 1y ago
Calling something "controversial" is a total non-argument. The book's science about IQ is solid.
In actuality, the content of the book was simply a collection of mainstream scientific consensus ideas at that time, without specific controversial add-ons. It's only after the book was published, the book unexpectedly was attacked by proto-woke people.
- breakyerself 1y agoYeah Nazi aligned eugenicist science is totally mainstream.
- machomaster 1y agoInventing strawman out of thin air in order to drown discussion, to attack individuals and paint them evil, that's literally what Nazis did. How ironic.