4 ms·
Interesting read, but I feel like they should have also benchmarked using COPY with Postgres. This should be far faster than a bulk insert, and it’s more in lin
by orf 1y ago
Interesting read, but I feel like they should have also benchmarked using COPY with Postgres. This should be far faster than a bulk insert, and it’s more in line with what they are benchmarking.
The omission feels… odd.
- sdairs 1y agoTo be honest, I just didn't think of it. But thanks for the suggestion, we'll give it a go!