3 ms·

Really good idea, I’ll have to try it out. The thing I really want is to have the ability to give a recipe for a new Claude code instance - spin up a docker ima

by chis 1y ago

Really good idea, I’ll have to try it out. The thing I really want is to have the ability to give a recipe for a new Claude code instance - spin up a docker image with code, data, and a running server and then let Claude work against that.

TheTaytay 1y ago
I’ve been wanting the same thing. I am currently experimenting with a container that adds what I want. I keep wanting my sandboxed dev machine that is preconfigured with Claude (and almost nothing else)…but then I also want my customized Claude. I saw someone here on HN the other day who just spins up a Docker container and shares their home directory Claude files with it to facilitate the customized Claude container: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44549802 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44549802
- adastra22 1y ago
  You can do this with devcontainer and still work within VSCode.
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
vunderba 1y ago
Agree would feel far more comfortable if each Claudia project was a separate docker container that was spun up with the appropriate tooling (Node, Python, etc.) particularly with flags like `--dangerously-skip-permissions`. There is an outstanding feature request around it at least: https://github.com/getAsterisk/claudia/issues/8 https://github.com/getAsterisk/claudia/issues/8
astral_drama 1y ago
I've developed a system that checks out a git repo into a docker compose container, tells claude to read a feature story, then implement it with --dangerously-skip-permissions turned on within the container. It work well enough. I think it's another workflow, that might suit your needs, but I think the real magic continues to be in the model. Similarly, I'm sure Claudia adds some nice window dressing. Eventually folks will settle in on some local maxima for interaction and software development with LLMs. Who know what it will look like? It'd be nice if whatever comes next bumps the industry out of the current scrum and sprint style workflows, if only to break folks out of the theatrics of these software personas and rituals. Here's my WIP: https://github.com/astral-drama/filter https://github.com/astral-drama/filter
- chrisdemarco 1y ago
  I’ve used something similar, it’s a good workflow!
smithclay 1y ago
Hey, it's not well known but Anthropic actually publishes their own devcontainer feature layer for this (1). Many different CLI wrappers and tools are starting to imbed it (2) but is a nice DIY/open-source way to sandbox. 1. https://github.com/anthropics/devcontainer-features https://github.com/anthropics/devcontainer-features 2. shameless plug, my own open-source CLI for doing this: https://github.com/smithclay/claudetainer https://github.com/smithclay/claudetainer

by chis 1y ago

TheTaytay 1y ago

I’ve been wanting the same thing. I am currently experimenting with a container that adds what I want. I keep wanting my sandboxed dev machine that is preconfigured with Claude (and almost nothing else)…but then I also want my customized Claude. I saw someone here on HN the other day who just spins up a Docker container and shares their home directory Claude files with it to facilitate the customized Claude container: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44549802 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44549802

adastra22 1y ago
You can do this with devcontainer and still work within VSCode.

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]

vunderba 1y ago

Agree would feel far more comfortable if each Claudia project was a separate docker container that was spun up with the appropriate tooling (Node, Python, etc.) particularly with flags like `--dangerously-skip-permissions`. There is an outstanding feature request around it at least: https://github.com/getAsterisk/claudia/issues/8 https://github.com/getAsterisk/claudia/issues/8

astral_drama 1y ago

I've developed a system that checks out a git repo into a docker compose container, tells claude to read a feature story, then implement it with --dangerously-skip-permissions turned on within the container. It work well enough. I think it's another workflow, that might suit your needs, but I think the real magic continues to be in the model. Similarly, I'm sure Claudia adds some nice window dressing. Eventually folks will settle in on some local maxima for interaction and software development with LLMs. Who know what it will look like? It'd be nice if whatever comes next bumps the industry out of the current scrum and sprint style workflows, if only to break folks out of the theatrics of these software personas and rituals. Here's my WIP: https://github.com/astral-drama/filter https://github.com/astral-drama/filter

chrisdemarco 1y ago
I’ve used something similar, it’s a good workflow!

smithclay 1y ago

Hey, it's not well known but Anthropic actually publishes their own devcontainer feature layer for this (1). Many different CLI wrappers and tools are starting to imbed it (2) but is a nice DIY/open-source way to sandbox. 1. https://github.com/anthropics/devcontainer-features https://github.com/anthropics/devcontainer-features 2. shameless plug, my own open-source CLI for doing this: https://github.com/smithclay/claudetainer https://github.com/smithclay/claudetainer