2 ms·
It wasn't Llama (Meta), it was LaMDA (Google). https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/google-engineer-claims-ai-chatbot-is-sentient-why-that-matters/ https
by dragonwriter 1y ago
It wasn't Llama (Meta), it was LaMDA (Google).
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/google-engineer-claims-ai-chatbot-is-sentient-why-that-matters/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/google-engineer-c...
- mdaniel 1y agoAh, thank you. While reading up on it, I found this juicy bit that I did not recall hearing at the time: > He further revealed that he had been dismissed by Google after he hired an attorney on LaMDA's behalf after the chatbot requested that Lemoine do so.[18][19] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaMDA#Sentience_claims https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaMDA#Sentience_claims Then again, it's plausible that if I asked GPT-5 "do you want me to get you an asylum lawyer?" it may very well say yes