> But it's a huge pile of technical debt. That's an interesting observation: how will LLM-generated code age? Maybe we don't care, we just test it and throw m

> But it's a huge pile of technical debt. That's an interesting observation: how will LLM-generated code age? Maybe we don't care, we just test it and throw more prompts at it. But already 90% of some jobs is understanding the legacy code someone else wrote. I suppose LLMs can be good at this. Unless their maintenance of legacy code is just throwing more complexity at it until it becomes unmanageably complex.