These seem very trivial, except the ABI (but only for people marketing software) and the last one, which is simply untrue. If you absolutely refuse to handle y

These seem very trivial, except the ABI (but only for people marketing software) and the last one, which is simply untrue. If you absolutely refuse to handle your own system's security ("Enter a password to do something on my own computer? No thank you!"), you really should leave the management of your computer to Microsoft, and ask their permission personally to view your own files. They'll faceid you, consider the merits of your request, and decide how much access you should have to your own life. In that way you can avoid sudo, or the concept of a multiuser computer entirely. As for the last one, it is simply untrue. Linux supports as much as or more hardware than Windows. Windows will more likely support the latest greatest stuff because people don't release hardware specs. But once Linux catches up, it keeps that hardware compatibility longer, and can always be reverted back to by using an old kernel even a decade or two after a piece of hardware is dropped.