3 ms·
>our clients are still a long way from being able to use those So it's simply a matter of time >often too erratic to be useful So sometimes it is useful.
by djeastm 1y ago
>our clients are still a long way from being able to use those
So it's simply a matter of time
>often too erratic to be useful
So sometimes it is useful.
- layer8 1y agoToo erratic to be net useful.
- anuramat 1y agoEven for code reviews/test generation/documentation search?
- layer8 1y agoDocumentation search I might agree, but that wasn’t really the context, I think. Code reviews is hit and miss, but maybe doesn’t hurt too much. They aren’t better at writing good tests than at writing good code in the first place.
- anuramat 1y ago> wasn't the context yeah, I'm just curious about the vibe in general > good tests are there any downsides to adding "bad tests" though? as long as you keep generated tests separate, it's basically free regression testing, and if something meaningfully breaks on a refactor, you can promote it to not-actually-slop