4 ms·
There are around theoretical 11,000 possible Korean blocks, which is a lot. But Unicode has ~98,000 Chinese characters. Nine times the characters is a quaint p
by bobthepanda 1y ago
There are around theoretical 11,000 possible Korean blocks, which is a lot. But Unicode has ~98,000 Chinese characters.
Nine times the characters is a quaint problem for computers but a very difficult problem for a physical typewriter.
- thaumasiotes 1y agoNo, it is a problem exactly equal to the other one. No typewriter can produce 98,000 different characters. And no typewriter can produce 11,000 different characters. With zero difference between hangul and hanja, how can the typewriter favor one over the other?
- bobthepanda 1y agoThere were Chinese typewriters but they were very large and a lot more annoying to use. Japan also used typewriting. They just look a lot different, with a giant cylinder of tiny keys to facilitate thousands of characters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQ-SHOsbH4Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQ-SHOsbH4Y Hangul ones were a lot smaller. I misspoke earlier; they had letter-based keyboards and mostly just did compromises on the shape of the syllabic blocks; a keyset for an initial character, a keyset for medial characters and a keyset for terminal characters. If you just assume the initial character set can be tiny to fit both the characters with and without bottom terminals, then you wind up with slightly odd-looking but perfectly serviceable typed Korean. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8lfgxBj440&list=PL7HFg4f79lQmMDmu9q-M31-G2-fJ-M9uj https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8lfgxBj440&list=PL7HFg4f79l...
- thaumasiotes 1y agoThanks! For reference, I talked about a typewriter code before, but I suspect that I was thinking of the telegraph code: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_telegraph_code https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_telegraph_code