You say "only 44,100 times per second" as if it were somehow deficient. It's not, assuming the purpose of the sampling is to be heard by a human ear. In fact,

You say "only 44,100 times per second" as if it were somehow deficient. It's not, assuming the purpose of the sampling is to be heard by a human ear. In fact, you'd be hard-pressed to make a legitimate, evidence-based argument justifying a significantly higher rate, for consumer music distribution purposes. http://drewdaniels.com/audible.pdf http://drewdaniels.com/audible.pdf