4 ms·
Because the people with the money aren’t going to just give it to everyone else. We already see the richest people hoard their money and still be unsatisfied wi
by dkersten 1y ago
Because the people with the money aren’t going to just give it to everyone else. We already see the richest people hoard their money and still be unsatisfied with how much they have. We already see productivity gains not transfer any benefit to the majority of people.
- closewith 1y agoThere is an old and reliable solution to this problem, the gibbet.
- dkersten 1y agoYes. However people are unwilling to take this approach unless things get really really bad. Even then, the powerful tend to have such strong control that people are afraid to act out of fear of reprisal. We’ve also been gaslit into believing that it’s not a good approach, that peaceful protests are more civilised (even though they rarely cause anything meaningful to actually change).