3 ms·
I wouldn't call it "technology". It's more of a successful experiment than technology, to me. Color separation cameras came two decades after, and this was rea
by vhf 14y ago
I wouldn't call it "technology". It's more of a successful experiment than technology, to me.
Color separation cameras came two decades after, and this was really a technology : making one camera capture at the same time 3 pictures on negative. (Where those very impressive pictures shown in the link are taken using the color separation process but without a color separation camera, and not on negative.)
- MichaelApproved 14y agoThis is indeed technology. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/technology http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/technology
- knowtheory 14y agoI don't think the distinction you have made is valid. Experiments are a kind of technology by any common definition. Just because this never rolled out into mass production doesn't mean that it wasn't a systematic application of scientific/engineering principles.
- 001sky 14y agoAu Contraire. Its not clear <you> are able to distinguish technique from technology. And even if so, how much proportional impact is technique vs. technology. And even then, and in this case in particular, ex-post-facto how much technology and/or technique have been applied to put these images online.