40 ms·
The first time I ever saw it, the text already looked better than cmd.exe via conhost.
by recursive 1y ago
The first time I ever saw it, the text already looked better than cmd.exe via conhost.
- oguz-ismail 1y agohttps://imgur.com/a/qA1fr71 https://imgur.com/a/qA1fr71 Something wrong with my eyes? Doesn't cmd.exe look smoother in this screenshot?
- MortyWaves 1y agoI find the Terminal more readable because the white seems brighter in your screenshots
- layer8 1y agoThe color is configurable for both.
- mvdtnz 1y agoTerminal looks far better.
- trenchpilgrim 1y agoMy Terminal looks great! https://imgur.com/a/js6Yzxf https://imgur.com/a/js6Yzxf
- MortyWaves 1y agoLooks like you’ve gone for something like the classic text mode 80x25?
- trenchpilgrim 1y agoMore Perfect DOS with a CRT filter, to remind me of my handmedown MS DOS/Win95 PC from elementary school.
- recursive 1y agoI agree. In those screenshots cmd looks better. Not sure what's up.
- DrinkyBird 1y agoIt's the lack of subpixel anti-aliasing (aka ClearType). For some reason it's being erased from a lot of modern software. It's why Windows >= 8 UWP apps and GNOME look so blurry.
- account42 1y agoIt's just another example of why developers shouldn't be given the fanciest tech available (in this case: high DPI screens) so that they have to experience how actual users see their software.
- Kwpolska 1y agocmd looks pixelated.
- Geezus_42 1y agocmd.exe looks worse to me. Particularly because of the lack of padding on the left.