4 ms·

> There's not a good reason to do this for the user. Yes, even more so when encountering false positives. Today I asked about a pasta recipe. It told me to thr

> There's not a good reason to do this for the user. Yes, even more so when encountering false positives. Today I asked about a pasta recipe. It told me to throw some anchovies in there. I responded with: "I have dried anchovies." Claude then ended my conversation due to content policies.

handoflixue 1y ago
The NEW termination method, from the article, will just say "Claude ended the conversation" If you get "This conversation was ended due to our Acceptable Usage Policy", that's a different termination. It's been VERY glitchy the past couple of weeks. I've had the most random topics get flagged here - at one point I couldn't say "ROT13" without it flagging me, despite discussing that exact topic in depth the day before, and then the day after! If you hit "EDIT" on your last message, you can branch to an un-terminated conversation.
- antonvs 1y ago
  Clearly you're planning something nefarious, if you're investigating such dangerous encryption techniques as ROT13.
  - whaleofatw2022 1y ago
    Just imagine how it might react to ROT26!
perihelions 1y ago
Claude flagged me for asking about sodium carbonate. I guess that it strongly dislikes chemistry topics. I'm probably now on some secret, LLM-generated lists of "drug and/or bombmaking" people—thank you kindly for that, Anthropic. Geeks will always be the first victims of AI, since excess of curiosity will lead them into places AI doesn't know how to classify. (I've long been in a rabbit-hole about washing sodas. Did you know the medieval glassmaking industry was entirely based on plants? Exotic plants—only extremophiles, halophytes growing on saltwater beach dunes, had high enough sodium content for their very best glass process. Was that a factor in the maritime empire, Venice, chancing to become the capital of glass since the 13th century—their long-term control of sea routes, and hence their artisans' stable, uninterrupted access to supplies of [redacted–policy violation] from small ports scattered across the Mediterranean? A city wouldn't raise master craftsmen if, half of the time, they had no raw materials to work on—if they spent half their days with folded hands).
- AlecSchueler 1y ago
  [flagged]
  - birn559 1y ago
    Geeks in general did not abuse women but geeks in general will always be the first victims of AI because the curiosity in parts is what defines a geek. Therefore, your argument is not sound.
- antonvs 1y ago
  > Geeks will always be the first victims of AI, since excess of curiosity will lead them into places AI doesn't know how to classify. Humans have the same problem. I remember reading about a security incident due to a guy using a terminal window on his laptop on a flight, for example. Or the guy who was reported for writing differential equations[1]. Or the woman who was reading a book about Syrian art[2]. I wouldn't worry too much about AI-generated lists. The lists you're actually on will hardly ever be the ones you imagine you're on. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/07/professor-flight-delay-terrorism-equation-american-airlines https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/07/professor-fl... [2] https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/04/british-woman-held-after-being-seen-reading-book-about-syria-on-plane https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/04/british-woman-...
- cwsx 1y ago
  ChatGPT does well for chemistry questions just btw
- simianwords 1y ago
  I find this concern over "LLM's can help you build bombs or poison" so fake. I'm sure this is a distraction from something else. LLM's can help me make a bomb.. so what? It can't get me something that doesn't already exist in the internet in some form. Ok it can help me understand how the individual pieces work but that doesn't get you so far from just reading the DIY bomb posts in internet.

handoflixue 1y ago

The NEW termination method, from the article, will just say "Claude ended the conversation" If you get "This conversation was ended due to our Acceptable Usage Policy", that's a different termination. It's been VERY glitchy the past couple of weeks. I've had the most random topics get flagged here - at one point I couldn't say "ROT13" without it flagging me, despite discussing that exact topic in depth the day before, and then the day after! If you hit "EDIT" on your last message, you can branch to an un-terminated conversation.

antonvs 1y ago
Clearly you're planning something nefarious, if you're investigating such dangerous encryption techniques as ROT13.
- whaleofatw2022 1y ago
  Just imagine how it might react to ROT26!

perihelions 1y ago

Claude flagged me for asking about sodium carbonate. I guess that it strongly dislikes chemistry topics. I'm probably now on some secret, LLM-generated lists of "drug and/or bombmaking" people—thank you kindly for that, Anthropic. Geeks will always be the first victims of AI, since excess of curiosity will lead them into places AI doesn't know how to classify. (I've long been in a rabbit-hole about washing sodas. Did you know the medieval glassmaking industry was entirely based on plants? Exotic plants—only extremophiles, halophytes growing on saltwater beach dunes, had high enough sodium content for their very best glass process. Was that a factor in the maritime empire, Venice, chancing to become the capital of glass since the 13th century—their long-term control of sea routes, and hence their artisans' stable, uninterrupted access to supplies of [redacted–policy violation] from small ports scattered across the Mediterranean? A city wouldn't raise master craftsmen if, half of the time, they had no raw materials to work on—if they spent half their days with folded hands).

AlecSchueler 1y ago
[flagged]
- birn559 1y ago
  Geeks in general did not abuse women but geeks in general will always be the first victims of AI because the curiosity in parts is what defines a geek. Therefore, your argument is not sound.
antonvs 1y ago
> Geeks will always be the first victims of AI, since excess of curiosity will lead them into places AI doesn't know how to classify. Humans have the same problem. I remember reading about a security incident due to a guy using a terminal window on his laptop on a flight, for example. Or the guy who was reported for writing differential equations[1]. Or the woman who was reading a book about Syrian art[2]. I wouldn't worry too much about AI-generated lists. The lists you're actually on will hardly ever be the ones you imagine you're on. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/07/professor-flight-delay-terrorism-equation-american-airlines https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/07/professor-fl... [2] https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/04/british-woman-held-after-being-seen-reading-book-about-syria-on-plane https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/aug/04/british-woman-...
cwsx 1y ago
ChatGPT does well for chemistry questions just btw
simianwords 1y ago
I find this concern over "LLM's can help you build bombs or poison" so fake. I'm sure this is a distraction from something else. LLM's can help me make a bomb.. so what? It can't get me something that doesn't already exist in the internet in some form. Ok it can help me understand how the individual pieces work but that doesn't get you so far from just reading the DIY bomb posts in internet.