4 ms·
> Time to cull the waterloo crowd Are implying that reducing the number of graduates from a single program (CS) at one specific university (Waterloo) from a co
by joshdavham 1y ago
> Time to cull the waterloo crowd
Are implying that reducing the number of graduates from a single program (CS) at one specific university (Waterloo) from a country 10x smaller from the US (Canada) will help lower tech employment in California?
- tstrimple 1y ago[flagged]
- ahmeneeroe-v2 1y agoWhy should US graduates compete with non-US workers in the US? Call me scared or incompetent or uncompetitive but I just don't want to compete in that way. All those people can stay in their countries and out-compete US grads there.
- hshdhdhj4444 1y agoBecause technology is a global industry and if you can’t compete with these workers you surely won’t be able to compete with these workers when the company that was willing to pay them $150k to work in San Francisco can pay them $50k to work out of Romania. Instead of that individual now paying 80-90% of their income to US taxes and US businesses and saving the rest in U.S. banks providing even cheaper capital for US businesses, they will be doing the same in Romania. And worse, if that person does create a new startup, the majority of employees hired will be in Romania, and only a tiny fraction would be Americans who moved there to work for that company, and would be competing with American companies with a much lower cost basis. But hey, Romania will be pleased for sure.
- ahmeneeroe-v2 1y agoI'll take the other side of this bet.