3 ms·
No, it's the website's fault for doing stupid cutesy stuff that makes the page harder to read. Don't victim-blame yourself here.
by bigstrat2003 1y ago
No, it's the website's fault for doing stupid cutesy stuff that makes the page harder to read. Don't victim-blame yourself here.
- nomel 1y agoYou should ask for a refund!
- stavros 1y agoI really don't understand this "everything must be 100% serious all the time". Why is it stupid?
- apodik 1y agoI generally think stuff like that make the web much more interesting. In this case it was distracting though.
- Gualdrapo 1y agoThe HN hivemind decries the lack of humanity and personality of the internet of nowadays but at the same time wants every website to be 100% text, no JS, no CSS because allegedly nobody needs CSS and, if you dare to do something remotely "fancy" with the layout, you have to build it with <table>s.
- jackyard86 1y agoThis is not about "lack of humanity", but about violating fundamental UX rules such as hiding your cursor at random times. It's offensive. You don't have to sacrifice usability while expressing personality.
- extraisland 1y agoI barely noticed it. The complaints I've read about it are making a mountain out of a molehill.
- forbiddenlake 1y agoI didn't read the article because all the moving bits were too distracting. Something also turned my cursor invisible, which is rude. Not sure anyone lost anything here, or anyone cares.
- q3k 1y agogod forbid people have fun on the internet